Applicant-led feedback
Human feedback on the Awards for All draft you wrote.
Matt reviews your own draft and provides a prioritised fix list. He does not write or rewrite the application on your behalf.
From £95
Send the fund, deadline and rough idea
Matt will assess the brief personally, confirm the cleanest service and send a fixed price before work starts. A chat remains available for complex projects after the initial brief.
What you receive
- Community-need and involvement feedback
- Checks on activities and outcomes
- Budget and delivery questions
- A prioritised fix list
- No application written on your behalf
Scope and responsibility: The National Lottery Community Fund says applicants should write their own application and does not accept applications written on their behalf by private businesses, consultants or bid writers.
Applicant ownership stays clear
The review route helps you see what an assessor may still question while leaving the final wording and submission with your organisation.
Inspect the writing before you enquire
Read genuine redacted extracts before choosing human support. Identifying information is replaced with [redacted], while the underlying wording is retained.
- Project description: Shows how project purpose, activity and public benefit can be made specific.
- Need and funder fit: Connects organisational context, funder priorities and the practical case for support.
- Access and inclusion: Shows partners, audience, access and delivery detail in a longer extract.
- Multiple writing extracts: A fuller set of redacted examples for inspecting tone, structure and specificity.
Clear responsibilities
Matt checks current assistance rules before accepting writing work. You check every fact, figure, budget line and commitment before submitting. No funding result is guaranteed.